STORE

View All

Sort by Publication

Sort by Technology/Topic

Worldwide Refinery Processing Review (Quarterly Issues)

FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING AND LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION
Publication date:4Q 2009
Item#: B20904

This issue of the Review includes a thorough evaluation of state-of-the-art commercial technology, plant operations and design, and innovative research and development work for fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) and light olefins production technologies.

Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC)

This section of the Review contains an in-depth look at current FCC process, hardware, and catalyst technologies. The technologies discussed will help a refiner to maximize the profitability of the FCCU by allowing the refiner to adapt to changing market conditions, specifically a shift from gasoline to diesel.

Historically, the fluid catalytic cracking unit has been tailored to be the refinery's top gasoline producer. The global economic recession since H2 2008, however, has recently kept gasoline demand low, especially in the West, making many FCC-based refineries unprofitable due to their surplus of gasoline. Thus, the current market encourages a reduction in gasoline production and an increase in middle distillates with growth in distillate demand more than doubling that of gasoline since 2002.

Global fluid catalytic cracking capacity increased by 1.15% or over 152K b/d to 13.22MM b/d between Jan. 2009 and Jan. 2010 with Asia-Pacific (200K b/cd) and Western Europe (54.3K b/cd) accounting for almost all of this growth. The US still ranks first in total FCC capacity (5.6MM b/cd) but has seen FCC capacity decrease over the last year due to decreasing demand and margins for gasoline.

With a call for reduction in CO2 emissions to combat global warming, refiners will need to begin to look for ways to curb GHG emissions to meet upcoming reduction targets. One area to consider will be the burning of catalyst coke in the FCC regenerator as it accounts for approximately 15-25% of a refinery's CO2 emissions.

More detailed information regarding fluid catalytic cracking in terms of supply and demand, capacity additions, and technology competition/development are discussed as part of the Market/Technology Trends and Opportunities section in this issue of the Review. Also, in the FCC section, new processes, catalysts, and topics covered include:

  • Shell's dual-riser MILOS process;
  • Albemarle's AMBER MD catalyst for use in gas oil operations looking to maximize bottoms conversion and LCO yields;
  • Albemarle's new GO-ULTRA catalyst which is manufactured using the new ONYX manufacturing technology;
  • BASF's novel Promixal Stable Matrix and Zeolite (Prox-SMZ) matrix material and a new catalyst (HDXtra) that utilizes Prox-SMZ to maximize distillate yields from the FCCU;
  • Grace Davison's third generation of EnhanceR catalysts, DieseliseR and ResidCrackerR, which both boost LCO yields;
  • Grace's second generation MIDAS catalyst, MIDAS-300, which maximizes LCO selectivity;
  • Grace's two low NOX combustion promoters, XNOX and DENOX-W;
  • INTERCAT's FCC catalyst addition systems;
  • SOX reduction additives from Albemarle (SOXDOWN) and Grace Davison (Super DESOX); and
  • A discussion of the latest patents and research papers regarding fluid catalytic cracking related to increasing the quantity and quality of gasoline produced from the FCCU, reducing NOX, SOX, PM, CO, and CO2 emissions, increasing LCO yields, processing resid and biofeeds, catalyst separation and regeneration systems, and process monitoring and control and computer modeling technologies.

Light Olefins Production

This section of the Review contains comprehensive analysis of refinery light olefins technology associated with the FCCU, and also, information of "on-purpose" light olefin production technologies: cracking of heavier olefins, metathesis, propane and butane dehydrogenation, and methanol-to-olefins. The processes will help to meet increasing demand for propylene and other light olefins in the future as petrochemical producers look for alternative to conventional steam cracking.

Refiners are primarily concerned with propylene production as a byproduct of FCC processing coupled with highly efficient recovery techniques. Alternative production techniques, however, are also important to refiners as feedstock supply and product recovery can be implemented in a highly-integrated configuration to improve production margins and overall plant profitability. Overall, the factors influencing light olefins production and the influence on refiners is highly regional specific due to differing refinery configurations, regional supply and demand trends, and the presence and/or viability of alternative production technologies

Additionally, increasing worldwide attention on industrial CO2 emissions in relation to global warming may support investment in alternative production technologies, as an estimated 180-200MM mt/y of CO2 are released in association with ethylene and propylene production throughout the world. Many of the on-purpose technologies claim gains in energy efficiency and improvements in emissions performance over existing thermal cracking, FCC, and cryogenic recovery technologies.

Worldwide propylene capacity for 2010 was estimated at 96.8MM mt/y. The Asia-Pacific region is credited with the largest portion of this total producing 24.269MM mt/y or 32.4% of the world's annual output. One estimate pegged the contribution of steam cracking to worldwide propylene supply at 61% in 2008, while petroleum refineries contributed 34% and on-purpose propylene plants accounted for only ~3% of capacity. Other estimates stated that on-purpose propylene production technologies accounted for ~5% of worldwide propylene production in 2007, and this number is expected to balloon to 12% by 2015

More detailed information regarding light olefins production in terms of supply and demand, capacity additions, and technology competition/development are discussed as part of the Market/Technology Trends and Opportunities section in this issue of the Review. Also, in the light olefins production section, new processes, catalysts, and topics covered include:

     
  • Axens's Riser Separation System used for high-severity FCC operations;
  • KBR's Advanced Catalytic Olefins process;
  • INDMAX FCC technology offered by Lummus Technology and Indian Oil Corp.;
  • Shell's dual-riser MILOS process;
  • Updated process descriptions and commercial data on Sinopec's DCC, FDFCC, CGP, MIP-CGP, and MIO processes
  • Sinopec's CPP and UOP's PetroFCC for petrochemical production;
  • Updated FCC additive offerings from Albemarle, BASF, JGC C&C, Grace Davison, IMP, IOC, and Sinopec;
  • Integral catalyst systems for enhanced propylene production from Albemarle, BASF, and Grace Davison;
  • Propane-propylene splitter technologies offered by Shaw and UOP;
  • Offgas olefins recovery techniques form AET, Air Products and Chemicals, Costain Oil, Gas & Process, and Linde BOC Process Plants;
  • Snamprogetti and Uhde's butenes recovery technology;
  • Superflex technology offered by KBR;
  • Lummus Technology's OCT for propylene via metathesis;
  • Updated commercial experience regarding PDH projects and technologies from Linde/BASF, Lummus Technology, Snamprogetti/Yarsintez, Uhde, and UOP;
  • Novel MTO processes licensed by Lummus Technology/SYN and Sinopec; and
  • A discussion of the latest patents and research papers regarding refinery and on-purpose light olefins production related to process configurations, new equipments, catalyst/additive innovations, and integrated operations.
  • Pricing Information

    Individual Use Multiple Users/Library/Site license
    Subscription Type Electronic version Print version Contact for pricing
    Info@Hydrocarbonpublishing.com
    +1-610-408-0117
    Pricing (US $) $1,995 $1,995
     

    • Pricing is for a single issue
    • No restriction on order dates
    • All print issues will be shipped first class or air mail
    • Multiple-copy discounts are available. Please contact us for specific terms.

    The Reviewis sold for the exclusive use of the subscriber. No other use, duplication, or publication of the Review or any part contained therein is permitted without written consent from Hydrocarbon Publishing Company, P.O. Box 661, Southeastern PA 19399 (USA).

Resources

FAQ
Alerts
Terms
Promotions
Contact Us